Skip to content

Library · Research

Keys and locks: mechanisms, makers and how they were mounted

A source-first guide to recording historical keys and locks: case types, mechanisms, keyways, makers' signatures and ownership marks, with photographed museum examples and live holdings.

Editorial reference · source-linked · no authentication or valuation

Describe the lock as a working object

A lock is a mechanism first and a decorated object second, and a good record covers both. Start with the overall form and dimensions, the materials of the case and the visible fittings, and the number and position of keyholes, handles and bolts. State whether the lock is complete, whether a key survives with it and whether the key is known to be original to the lock or only fits it.

Do not force a mechanism to discover how it works. Old springs and wards can break, and a seized bolt is evidence of the lock's condition. Record what moves freely, what does not and what was not tried. If the internal mechanism is described from a museum's own examination, cite that record rather than presenting it as your observation.

Reference: Editorial methodology

Rim locks, mortise locks and portability

How a lock was fitted to a door changes how it should be described. The V&A record for a rim lock by Walter Bickford explains that a rim lock's mechanism is enclosed in a case mounted on the surface of a door, unlike later mortise locks built into the door, so it could be removed if its owners travelled or moved. Record the mounting type you can see and note fixing holes, staples and keepers.

Because locks could be moved and reused, the building or door a lock is associated with may not be where it was first fitted. Keep documented history, such as a museum's record of a specific door, separate from inference. An unrecorded association should stay a question in the entry rather than become part of its title.

Reference: V&A: Lock and key, Walter Bickford, England, 1650–1700 (museum record)

Keys: bow, shank and bit

Describe a key in three parts: the bow that is held, the shank or barrel, and the bit that engages the lock. Note whether the shank is solid or hollow, the shape of any cuts in the bit and any decoration on the bow. Measure overall length and the bit's dimensions; these help compare a key with a lock without trying it in the mechanism.

Highly decorated keys may have been made as much for display or ceremony as for use. Record decoration, monograms and crests exactly and do not identify an owner from a coat of arms unless a cited heraldic source or museum record does so. A key found alone rarely identifies its lock, and the entry should say so.

Reference: Editorial methodology

Signatures, arms and dated plates

Some locksmiths signed their work on the case or on an engraved plate, and some locks carry royal or family arms. Transcribe every inscription, signature and date exactly and photograph it in raking light. A signature names who claimed the work; it does not by itself establish where every part was made or that no parts were replaced.

Arms and dates can date the commission, the owner or a later alteration. Keep them in separate fields and cite the source that interprets them. Where a museum attributes a lock to a named maker on stylistic grounds alone, Orbis records that as an attribution rather than a signature.

Reference: V&A: Lock and key, Walter Bickford, England, 1650–1700 (museum record)

Iron, steel and brass need gentle care

Ferrous metals rust in damp conditions, and brass can tarnish and corrode where salts from handling remain on the surface. Keep locks and keys in a stable, dry environment, handle them with gloves and support heavy cases from below. Avoid oiling, polishing or removing corrosion without conservation advice: heat-blued steel, gilding and engraved detail are easily lost.

Store keys so that they do not knock against each other, and label each with its record number rather than tying keys together on a ring. When a lock and key belong together, store them together and record that relationship.

Reference: National Park Service: Museum Handbook

Build a record another researcher can check

Photograph the front, back, keyholes and any inscriptions at a known scale, and photograph a key alongside its lock where both survive. Keep measurements, condition notes and source citations with the images, and mark which statements are your observations and which come from a museum or publication.

The live figures below show how many key and lock entries Orbis currently publishes and how they spread by period and confidence. They are a snapshot of this catalogue, not a count of surviving locks or keys.

Reference: Editorial methodology

Evidence is not the same as certainty

Visible feature
Record and comparePhotograph and describe exactly what is observed, with any viewing limitations.
Limits of the evidenceAppearance alone does not establish hidden construction, materials or authenticity.
Source attribution
Record and compareKeep a named record or publication beside the claim it supports.
Limits of the evidenceRepeated descriptions are not necessarily independent verification.
Unknown detail
Record and compareState Research required; preserve conflicting readings and missing views.
Limits of the evidenceA missing observation must not become an invented fact.

Frequently asked questions

Does a key that fits a lock prove they belong together?
No. Record that it fits; original pairing needs documentation.
Does a coat of arms identify the owner?
Only when a cited heraldic source or museum record interprets it.
Are the figures below production or survival totals?
No. They count published Orbis catalogue holdings only.

Sources and further reading

  1. Orbis editorial methodology and source hierarchy
  2. V&A: Lock and key, Walter Bickford, England, 1650–1700 (museum record)
  3. National Park Service: Museum Handbook

Institutional guidance supports the general methods discussed here. It is not an assessment of your individual object; seek qualified advice for conservation treatment or authentication.

Live catalogue figures

Published Orbis entries only; these are catalogue holdings, not production totals or estimates of surviving objects.

Published entries

224

Individual types and documented families

With photographs

100%

224 with a credited real-object photo

Dated span

395 BC – 2012

177 entries with their own date

Verified or well documented

0

Highest two confidence levels

Dated entries by century

  • 4th century BC1
  • 1st century1
  • 3rd century1
  • 10th century1
  • 11th century1
  • 13th century3
  • 14th century7
  • 15th century21
  • 16th century35
  • 17th century58
  • 18th century31
  • 19th century14
  • 20th century2
  • 21st century1

Only the 177 entries carrying their own date to within about 150 years are counted, by the earliest year given. These are catalogue holdings, not production totals.

Materials recorded in the physical descriptions

  • Steel163
  • Bronze27
  • Brass22
  • Zinc12
  • Copper8
  • Silver7
  • Gold4

An entry made of several materials is counted once under each. Materials are counted only where the description states them.

Confidence of the published entries

  • Documented220
  • Probable4

Confidence reflects how well the sources support each entry's identification, not the object's quality or importance.

Browse 224 published entries